Fall 2007

Accessibility Services to offer New Course
By Linda Stango, Senior Architect

To coincide with the adoption of the updated New York State Building Code and the New York City Construction Code, United Spinal Association will begin presenting a new continuing education program which reflects the changes in the both codes.  The program  will focus on state and federal accessibility requirements impacting both commercial and residential occupancies.  Attendees will gain an understanding of which accessibility requirements are most restrictive and which represent a safe harbor.  In addition, this seminar will provide attendees with an overview of the revised ADA/ABA Accessibility Guidelines and its harmonization with model codes as they relate to accessibility requirements.  This course will focus on problem application areas in commercial facilities, accessibility requirements in existing facilities, types of dwelling units in residential occupancies and life safety issues.

If you are interested in learning more about this program or attending a seminar, please contact Linda Stango at 917.921.2766 or via email at lstango@unitedspinal.org.   

The Fair Housing Act applies to the new construction of multifamily housing facilities with four or more units if the facility was occupied after March 13, 1991 or the last building permit or renewal thereof was issued by a state, county, or local government on or before June 15, 1990.  The following accessible design features apply to all units in buildings with elevators and to all ground floor units in buildings without elevators:

  • All doors into and within all premises must be wide enough to allow passage by persons in wheelchairs.
  • All premises must contain an accessible route into and through the dwelling unit.
  • All light switches, electrical outlets, thermostats and environmental controls must be located in an accessible location.
  • Reinforcements in the bathroom walls for later installation of grab bars around toilet, tub and shower must be provided.
  • Usable kitchens and bathrooms must be provided so that a person who uses a wheelchair can maneuver about the space.

Also, at least one building entrance must be on an accessible route and all public and common use areas must be readily accessible.

The FHA does not apply to the renovation or alteration of existing housing facilities.

Thus, the question we are now facing 17 years after the effective date of the Fair Housing Act is what is the responsibility of builders, owners, and operators of covered housing facilities that were designed after the effective date but did not comply with some or all of the accessible design features?

The answer to this question is going to depend on the location of the housing facility as different courts have reached different decisions.  Most courts have used the continuing violation theory.  Meaning if the housing facility was designed and constructed with features that violated the Fair Housing Act and its Accessibility Guidelines then the violation continues until it is remedied.  This has been the decision in cases brought in many states including Maryland, Montana, and New York. 

Other courts have held that the Fair Housing Act requires a complaint be filed within two years of when the violation occurred so, in other words, the case against the builder, developer, etc. must be filed two years after the facility was built.  This time frame is a little harder to ascertain a specific date as large housing facilities are often constructed in phases.  One court in Kentucky attempted to tackle this issue and held that the two year period began to run after the last unit was sold.

Many cases have settled before the court could render a final decision.  One of the largest settlements was against Archstone-Smith Trust.  The settlement required a survey of 71 apartment complexes with a total of 12,000 units covered by the Fair Housing Act throughout the United States, removal of the barriers at a cost estimate of $20 million dollars, and 1.5 million in attorney fees (not including the cost of Archstone-Smith Trust’s attorney’s fees), court costs, and damages.

A prudent owner of a housing facility covered by the Fair Housing Act should have an independent assessment done of its facility for compliance with the Fair Housing Act.  This will bring peace of mind if all features comply and will cost less money to find and rectify any violations rather than wait to defend a legal action.

Sites: Accessible Route Requirements of the Fair Housing Act


By John Rooney

The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 is an expansion of discrimination prohibitions based on race, color, national origin religion and sex to people with disabilities and familial status.  This affects builders, designers and developers because the amendments not only apply to policies but also the design and construction of multi-family housing.

In short, the Fair Housing Act (FHA) applies to new construction of multi-family housing that consists of four or more dwelling units. Multi-family housing built for first occupancy after March 13, 1991 is required to comply.  There is a misconception that compliance with FHA is based on federal funding; however the law pertains to multifamily housing whether the funding is public or private.  Please note that the presence of federal funding for housing will required compliance with the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS).

One aspect of our work in Accessibility Services is to assist designers, developers and builders with FHA compliance.  In our efforts to do this we provide training, plan review and site reviews.  There are specific compliance issues that we have come across numerous times; one of them is the requirement to provide accessible routes on building sites. The question of where they are required is the purpose of this article.

Site Arrival Points:

The FHA Guidelines require an accessible route to be provided from site arrival points.  It is important to determine how people will arrive at the site in order to determine where accessible routes are required.  Site arrival points include public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, accessible passenger loading zones and public streets or sidewalks.  An accessible route is required from site arrival points to accessible building entrances.  An exception to the required aforementioned accessible routes is applied if doing so is impractical to do.  Site impracticality is based on difficult terrain or unusual site characteristics such as locations in a federally designated flood-plain or coastal high-hazard area.  There are site tests found in the Fair Housing Act Design Manual that can be used to determine whether the exception can be applied.  This manual is a great resource and can be found online at the following link: www.huduser.org/publications/destech/fairhousing.html

Accessible Site Facilities:

The FHA Guidelines require an accessible route from dwelling covered by the act to all public and common use areas.  Examples of facilities required to be served by an accessible include -but not limited to- exterior mailboxes, exterior trash disposal areas, playgrounds, swimming pools, recreation areas and clubhouses.  An accessible route is not required between buildings that only contain dwelling units covered by the FHA unless one of the buildings contains a facility or amenity, e.g. a laundry room that is shared by the covered buildings.  The FHA Guidelines permit the use of a vehicular route in place of an accessible pedestrian route between covered buildings and public or common use site facilities in some situations.  When the finished grade exceeds 1:12 or other physical obstructions -outside the control of the owner of the development- prevent the installation of an accessible route between covered dwelling units and public or common use areas then a vehicular route is permitted.  The use of the vehicular route in lieu of an accessible route requires the provision of accessible parking spaces at covered dwelling units and the provision of accessible parking spaces at each common or public use facility not served by an accessible pedestrian route.

An often overlooked requirement of the FHA is the provision of exterior accessible routes from site arrival points and accessible routes that serve public and common use facilities on a site. It is a great benefit to consider these issues in the initial planning stages of Multi-family dwelling units covered by the Fair Housing Amendments Act to ensure compliance.

New Initiatives To Expand Accessibility In N.Y.C.
By Dominic Marinelli
Click here to read the article PDF.

United Spinal works with other Disability Organizations to Improve Residential Accessibility Requirements

As United Spinal has previously reported, Type A units required in alterations to apartments will no longer be required in the 2007 edition of the International Building Code (IBC).  To respond to proponents of the code change eliminating this requirement,
United Spinal Association has worked with other disability organizations in drafting a proposal that will clarifying when these adaptable features will be required - when more than twenty (20) units are altered, 2 percent will have to provide Type A features.

3409.8.8 Type A dwelling or sleeping units. Where more than 20 Group R-2 dwelling or sleeping units are being altered or added, the requirements of Section 1107 for Type A units and Section 907 for visible alarms apply only to the quantity of spaces being altered or added. 

Recognizing the need to increase the availability of accessible housing stock, the American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD) the Disability Rights Education Defense Fund (DREDF), National Council for Independent Living (NCIL), Paralyzed Veterans Association (PVA) worked on developing the code proposal that would provide the same level of adaptability as what was required in the 2006 edition of the International Building Code (IBC).

These same disability organizations joined the US Department of Housing and Urban Development in a separate proposal to propose that an effective date be added to an otherwise blanket exception for "Type B" units in existing facilities.   The IBC and its accessibility standard A117.1 refer to the adaptable features required by the federal Fair Housing Amendments Act’s Accessibility Guidelines as a "Type B" unit.

Because these guidelines do not require adaptive features in existing multi-family dwelling units, existing building code’s have used the all encompassing exception below:

Type B dwelling or sleeping units required by Section 1107 of the International Building Code are not required to be provided in existing buildings and facilities

However, there is a significant flaw with such a general exception.

If a covered multi-family dwelling unit (a residential building with 4 or more units) is built on or after March 13, 1991 and for whatever reason does not comply, it would be inaccurate to not indicate the effective date Fair Housing Amendments Act’s Accessibility Guidelines.

The proposal of organization’s representing people with disabilities simply adds the March 13, 1991 effective date to the exception.

"It is important that the code is not contributing to continuing violations of the federal law.  What we can’t understand is how the IBC can be considered a ’safe harbor’ for compliance with Fair Housing with such a glaring deficiency," United Spinal Association’s Dominic Marinelli, said.

By HUD recognizing that a code or standard is a "safe harbor" it means that code or standard is equivalent to the Fair Housing’s Accessibility Guidelines.

"If our proposal is not successful, organization’s representing people with disabilities will have to formally ask HUD to reserve their ’safe harbor’ designation of the 2009 International Building Code.

The first opportunity that the voting membership of the International Codes Council (ICC) will have to vote on these proposals is during ICC’s first meeting of the 2007/2008 code cycle on February 18th through March 2nd at the Palm Springs Convention Center in Palm Springs, California. 

When Will the New Codes Take Effect in NYS and NYC?

New NYC Construction Codes
Intro 578-A, which is comprised of the new Building Code, Fuel Gas Code, Mechanical Code and Administrative provisions, was signed into law by Mayor Bloomberg on July 3rd, 2007.  Through an effort undertaken by the Department of Buildings and over 400 volunteers from industry, real estate, labor and government, New York City’s 20 year-old accessibility requirements (Local Law 58) will be replaced with the 2003 edition of the International Building Code (IBC).  The new Building Code will reference the 2003 edition of ICC/ANSI A117.1 as its technical guidelines for Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities, which is harmonized with the U.S. Access Board’s revised Americans with Disabilities Act/Architectural Barriers Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADA/ABA Accessibility Guidelines). 
The new NYC Construction Codes, including the Plumbing Code in Local Law 99/2005 and the Administrative Provisions, Building, Fuel Gas, and Mechanical Codes in Local Law 33/2007 will become effective on July 1, 2008.  Individuals will have the option at that time to use either the old or new code for one year. On July 1, 2009, the codes will become mandated for new construction. It should be noted that certain provision, including those relating to administration, enforcement, special inspections, and construction safety will apply to all projects as of July 1, 2008.
The new NYC Construction Codes are available online on the NYC Department of Building’s website: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dob/html/model/construction_code.shtml

Updated New York State Codes
The current Building Code of New York State uses combined language from the 2000 edition of the IBC and the 2001 Supplement to the IBC in its Building Code, which references the 1998 edition of ICC/ANSI A117.1 as its technical guidelines for Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities.  Rather than using Chapter 34 of the IBC for existing structures, the Building Code of New York State requires existing buildings and facilities to comply with Appendix K.
These construction requirements, for both new and existing facilities, have been updated and will soon be usable.  With the help of the state’s Department of State’s Division of Code Enforcement and Administration and its Technical Subcommittees, New York State has adopted the 2003 edition of the IBC, which references the 2003 edition of the ICC/ANSI A117.1 as its technical guidelines for Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities, and the International Existing Building Code (IEBC).
The updated Building Code and Existing Building Code are expected to be published in the October 3, 2007 publication of the Federal Register.  Individuals will have the option on this date to begin using these new codes.  On January 1, 2008, the Building Code and Existing Building Code will become mandated for new construction.  These new codes have been available to purchase from the International Code Council (ICC) since August 20, 2007.  For more information, visit the ICC website: http://www.iccsafe.org/.

Draft copies of the new codes are available online at the following sites:

Building Code: http://www2.iccsafe.org/states/new_york/NY_Building/building_frameset.htm

Existing Building Code: http://www2.iccsafe.org/states/new_york/NY_ExistingBldg/existingbldg_frameset.htm

 

09/07/07 Yankees Outreach Meeting Minutes

Outreach Meeting at Yankee Stadium
September 7, 2007
1 PM - 3 PM

Dominic Marinelli from United Spinal Association provided introductions and a brief overview of our agenda, which included the following items:

• Construction Update
• Signage
• Brochure and Online Access Guide
• Ticket Policy

1. Construction Update – Bradd Crowley, HOK Sport

Pictures were shown to attendees displaying the progress in construction of the new stadium.

Questions:

Q: How many seats will be provided in the new stadium?
A: Approximately 50,000 seats

Q: How many of the approximately 50,000 seats are luxury box seats?
A: 1,000 seats

Q: Is the number of seats at the new stadium reduced due to the luxury boxes?
A: No, the new stadium will have fewer seats because row dimensions have been increased in the new stadium. The new stadium will have wider row dimensions so that attendees are provided with more room at their seats.

Q: Will field dimensions be the same at the new stadium:
A: Yes, the field dimensions will be the same at the new stadium. The 1st row of seats behind home plate will be located closer in the new stadium.

2. Signage – Amy Siegel, C&G Partners

• Signage will be white text on a dark blue background (Yankees colors).
• Signage identifying permanent rooms and spaces will be located on the wall adjacent to the latch side of the door, 60 inches above the floor to the centerline of the sign.
• All rooms will only be identified by numbers which will include raised characters and Braille.
• Some rooms will only be identified by a number; some will also have a name.
• Elevator and stair signage will include both raised characters and Braille.
• Wheelchair viewing locations are fenced in and identified by signage that includes the section number and the International Symbol of Accessibility.
Questions:

Q: If individuals with disabilities not using wheelchairs will be seated in the wheelchair viewing locations, will it be confusing to only have the International Symbol of Accessibility (wheelchair symbol) at the viewing locations?
A: Wheelchair viewing locations are required by city and federal accessibility guidelines to be identified with the International Symbol of Accessibility.

Q: Although everyone who attends outreach meetings knows that all toilet rooms at the new stadium will be accessible, how will others know if signage is not provided?
A: Signage would only be required at toilet rooms that are not accessible and all of the toilet rooms at the new stadium will be accessible.

Comment: New stadium will be an example of a new era of construction where everything is accessible and does not need to be identified with signage.

Comment: Several attendees feel that without signage identifying toilet rooms as accessible, people will not know that they are accessible, especially out-of-towners.

Amy Segal suggested, as a possible solution, that the International Symbol of Accessibility be provided on directional signage to toilet rooms, rather than providing a sign at every toilet room with the symbol.

Suggestion: Provide signage on toilet rooms and on the accessible stall(s) within these toilet rooms reminding individuals without a disability that they should not use accessible toilet stalls or the unisex toilet rooms.

Q: How many unisex toilet rooms will be provided at new stadium?
A: 14

Discussion with Attendees: regarding the placement of signage to alert the public about the availability of an Assistive Listening System at the new stadium.

Suggestions:
• Provide signage stating the availability of Assistive Listening System at all stadium entrances, turnstiles, all portals into stadium, and at each ticket booth.
• Print information on Assistive Listening System on tickets.
• Make sure that information tells attendees where devices can be picked-up.
• Ticket box office operators could announce to callers the availability of the Assistive Listening System.
• Announce on Yes network, on Yankees website, Ticket Master website, newspaper ads, radio broadcasts, etc.
• Knowledge of the availability is important, especially if Yankees provide an alternate channel on the FM system for a play-by-play broadcast.
• Ensure that signage uses the correct symbols – use the following website as an example: www.hearingloop.org

3. Brochure and Online Access Guide – Dominic Marinelli, United Spinal Association

Yankees brochure and online access guide could be a good place to provide information to Yankee fans with disabilities, such as the availability of an Assistive Listening System or the fact that all toilet rooms and concession stands are accessible, etc.

Question to attendees: Would a Brochure and Online Access Guide be worthwhile?

Replies from attendees:
• Yes, an access guide would be worthwhile but not a panacea since not everyone may read the guide or know of its availability.
• Suggestion to integrate accessibility features into a new stadium guide, rather than have a separate section on access.
• If accessibility features are integrated into brochure, the info may be missed if individuals do not read entire brochure.
• Suggestion to integrate accessibility features into general stadium brochure and provide a separate access guide.
• Suggestion to look at Metropolitan Opera online brochure as a good example to follow.

Questions:

Q: How many captioning boards will be provided at new stadium?
A: 2 on the first and third base facade. The main scoreboard has the ability to provide captioning.

Comment: FedEx stadium has 2 captioning boards provided on each end of stadium and many plays are missed because you have to keep turning your head away from field to see captioning boards.

Reply: At new Yankee stadium, all seats face towards 2nd base so if captioning boards are located in sight of 2nd base, individuals will be able to see the field and the captioning boards.

Q: Will captioning be mixed case letters or all upper/lower case? Many attendees agree that captioning needs to be mixed case letters.
A: Follow-up on exact type of characters available on captioning board will be provided.

Q: Where will induction loops be provided?
A: An induction loop will be provided in conference center and at one window within the main ticket booth

Comment: All ticket booths should be provided with an induction loop.

Reply: Follow-up on the possibility of providing a loop at one ticket window at each main ticket distribution point in the new stadium will be provided.

4. Ticket Policy – Dominic Marinelli, United Spinal Association

Two main ticket policy issues include:

1. Enforcement /ticket fraud
2. Accommodating other disabilities, other than individuals who use wheelchairs, in accessible seating locations, such as blind and visually impaired individuals.
• Accommodate service/guide dog
• Proximity of seats to field
• Unobstructed line of sight from seats

Proposal: Although new federal accessibility guidelines only require .5% of seating to be accessible, more then 1% of viewing locations within the new stadium will be accessible to achieve compliance with current city and federal accessibility standards.

Suggestion: Half of the accessible seats will be distributed as they are at the current Yankee Stadium, thereby satisfying federal accessibility requirements. The other half will be reserved for “club” members. Yankee fans can voluntarily join this free club – in order to join, members will have to prove that they have a disability that would require them to be accommodated with accessible seating. This suggested ticket policy idea was provided to the U.S. Department of Justice independent of the new Yankee Stadium in August for their review/comments.

Comment: If any Yankee fans do not feel comfortable providing proof of disability, they can purchase accessible seating without joining club (like they currently do at the stadium). If people with hidden disabilities do not want to join the club as they would be viewing games in wheelchair spaces that will feature folding chairs, they can purchase the remaining 99% of seats available.


Powered by Wordpress
Copyright Accessibility Services